Sunday, 1 June 2008

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - Film Comments

Let's face it, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was never going to quite match the expectations everyone had for it, but in fairness, you shouldn't have ridiculous expectations! After all, the Indiana Jones films are pulpy throwbacks, not fine art. That Crystal Skull is great entertainment, doesn't pretend Harrison Ford is 30 and features a sprightly John Williams score, is almost enough in my book. Perhaps the worst thing about it is that it follows Last Crusade, which seemed so final in its conclusion. Indy, dad and buddies riding off into the sunset seemed just perfect and trilogies are a tried and tested film making format. Raiders kicks it off at a visceral pace, Temple of Doom goes darker and Last Crusade is the slightly lighter, but nicely conclusive third part. Crystal Skull just feels like an appendix. The original trilogy might not have told a single story, but they worked, contrasting nicely with each other. Crystal Skull just sits at the end, after a bit of a break, feeling like an Indy film, but not an essential one.

Still, no point whinging about its faults (not that it's stopped me before) as it's a great piece of entertainment. Harrison Ford has never really been anyone other than Indy or Han Solo for me (sad but true) and so him being back on screen as Indy is just right. Karen Allen certainly doesn't look quite as feisty as Marion, even if she sounds it. Shia Le Thingy as Indy Jnr actually acquits himself perfectly well enough; I can almost see an Indy Jones Jnr film at some point, although I doubt Le Thingy would do it, but it's a potentially neat idea. Although would have to stick to a cold war setting. As noted, John Williams' score is terrific fun, if not quite as memorable as the first three, but these things are all relative. It's funny, reviews of the album have been generally positive, but because it's Williams, expectations have been sky high. Yet, when I compare it to most blockbuster scores this summer, it's still in a league of its own. It's real music, something that stands outside the film (for the most part, at least) and while relatively not as memorable, the three major themes are presented fairly strongly within the film.

I rather hope that this is the final fling for Indy, dragging it out any more just wouldn't work. I doubt Spielberg or Ford have much appetite, although given Lucas' love of flogging his franchises, it's not entirely unlikely he could work on something. Having said that, with the relative failure of the Young Indiana Jones Chronicles, maybe he realises the appetite for more Indy might be sated by the new film and will just stick to the 43,256,546 Star Wars related projects he has going on. Go see Crystal Skull, if you're a fan, there should be enough moments to give you goosebumps and excitement aplenty. For everyone else, see it anyway, it may not convince disbelievers of the impact Raiders had all those years ago, but only but the most pretentious will walk away without having enjoyed almost every minute.

3 comments:

Cindylover1969 said...

I was told by a friend that Transformers was a better movie. It isn't.

Tom said...

I quite enjoyed Transformers (more than I ever expected), but I would concur that Indy was better.

Unknown said...

I conclude that Indy will live more in the minds of people than transformers , even if both are great movies by there own merits (of course this is kind of trading water for rocks really). Speaking of indy i kind of had lots of fun (although temple of doom indeed is the one for me!)